“I have been asked to assist with a Return to work policy for our medical doctors. Can you provide any policy examples? If an MD is returning from a substance abuse rehab program, would the program certify that the MD is ok to return to work? What happens with the MD’s license to practice medicine?”

Managing Physician Impairment: Identification, Intervention, and Holistic Support

Physicians play a crucial role in maintaining the health and well-being of their patients. However, the concern around impaired physicians is a growing issue that demands attention. Statistics indicate that approximately 10-15% of healthcare professionals, including physicians, will experience a substance use disorder at some point during their careers (1). Beyond substance abuse, many physicians also grapple with mental health issues, including depression, stress, and burnout (2). The failure to address these challenges can lead to dire consequences such as compromised patient care, increased medical errors, and significant legal and financial burdens on healthcare practices.

The Impact of Physician Impairment

Statistics and Facts

Substance abuse among physicians is not as rare as one might think. It is estimated that between 10-15% of physicians may develop a dependency on alcohol or drugs (1). The problem extends beyond just substance abuse; mental health is another significant concern. A study published in JAMA showed that nearly 30% of resident physicians exhibit symptoms of depression (2). Even more alarming, over half reported experiencing burnout. These mental health challenges are sometimes accompanied by more drastic outcomes, as evidenced by higher suicide rates among physicians compared to the general population, with about 300-400 physicians dying by suicide annually in the United States (3).

Implications for Patient Care

The repercussions of physician impairment are profound and multifaceted, particularly concerning patient safety. Impairment affects a physician’s judgment and concentration, leading to an increase in medical errors. Diagnoses may be delayed or incorrect due to diminished cognitive functions, which can negatively impact patient outcomes, increasing morbidity and even mortality. Such compromised care underscores the critical need for timely recognition and intervention.

Consequences and Liability for Medical Practices

The implications of physician impairment extend to legal and financial domains for medical practices or health systems. There is an increased risk of negligence lawsuits, which can be costly and damaging to an institution’s reputation. Financially, the costs related to litigation, settlements, and elevated malpractice insurance premiums can be significant. Moreover, the loss of trust and credibility with patients and within the community can further erode a medical practice’s standing and effectiveness.

State Laws and Procedures for Reporting Physician Impairment

Reporting Physician Impairment to Medical Boards

State laws regarding the reporting of physician impairment vary significantly, but generally, they require healthcare professionals to report colleagues when there’s reasonable belief of impairment affecting their clinical competency. Here’s a broad overview of common elements across different states:

• Mandatory Reporting: Many states mandate healthcare providers to report impaired colleagues to their respective medical boards. Failure to report can result in penalties or disciplinary action against the observer.
• Confidentiality: States often have confidentiality provisions to protect those who report an impaired physician, encouraging reporting without fear of retribution.
• Exceptions: Some states allow exceptions to mandatory reporting if the physician in question is actively participating in a professional health program or receiving treatment that includes oversight.

Laura L Radke, MD, Adjunct Assistant Professor of Medicine and Senior Medical Director, Froedtert & Medical College of Wisconsin Occupational Health Services describes Wisconsin’s procedures:

“In Wisconsin, we would be required to report to the state licensing board.  The provider would then be managed through their impaired professionals program.  Often they are required to do random drug screens for a period of time at their expense if they wish to continue practicing, and the program only releases them to return to work when they feel they are in a safe condition to do so.  The state of Wisconsin manages the random schedules and the provider goes to a location that has agreed to work with the state on this.”

NAOHP Members can access Froedterts Impaired Physicians Policies here

Oversight of Physician Treatment Programs

States have developed specific policies and procedures for overseeing physician treatment programs, aiming to ensure physicians receive appropriate care while safeguarding public safety:

• Designated Programs: Many states have designated programs approved by the medical board for the treatment of impaired physicians. These programs typically provide structured recovery support, including counseling and peer assistance.
• Compliance Monitoring: Participants are often required to adhere to strict compliance measures, with regular reports to the medical board. Non-compliance can lead to further investigations or sanctions.

Licensure Revocation and Restoration

The process surrounding licensure revocation and restoration is critical:

• Licensure Revocation: States reserve the right to revoke a physician’s license if they pose a significant risk to patient safety and are unresponsive to treatment. Due process is essential, with most states providing hearings prior to any revocation.
• Licensure Restoration: Restoration procedures typically involve the thorough demonstration of recovery and fitness to practice. This may include successful completion of a treatment program, medical clearance, and an evaluation by board-appointed professionals.

Return to Clinical Duties and Monitoring

The safe return of a physician to clinical duties is a structured process, usually requiring:

• Medical Clearance: Impaired physicians must often acquire medical clearance from designated healthcare providers, confirming their capability to resume practice.
• Structured Reentry Plans: Many states require the development of detailed reentry plans, often encompassing phased return schedules and duty modifications as necessary.

Follow-Up Testing and Monitoring

Once physicians return to their duties, follow-up testing and monitoring are essential components for ensuring sustained recovery and patient safety:

• Random Testing: Regular, unannounced testing for substance use may be a component, ensuring adherence to sobriety commitments.
• Ongoing Monitoring: States frequently mandate ongoing monitoring of professional conduct and performance, often overseen by the medical board or the appropriate health program.
• Continuous Education and Support: Physicians may be required to participate in continued education and peer support groups as part of their remediation plan.

Special Consideration for Physician-Owned Practices

Physician-owned practices face unique challenges when a physician-owner is impaired. Operational disruptions can occur, particularly if the impaired physician is integral to the practice’s functionality. Staff members can experience heightened stress, job insecurity, and ethical dilemmas when engaging with an impaired colleague. These conditions can amplify the legal and financial risks, given the practice’s dependence on its physician-owner, making clear pathways for intervention even more critical.

Recognizing Impairment in Physicians

Recognizing impairment in physicians can be daunting. The stigma associated with vulnerability often leads to concealment. However, certain indicators can alert colleagues and management to problems. Behavioral changes in a physician, such as increased irritability or noticeable mood swings, may suggest underlying issues. A decline in professional performance, with increased errors or absenteeism, can also be a telltale sign. Physical manifestations such as frequent illnesses, unexplained changes in weight, or signs consistent with substance use—such as the smell of alcohol or unsteady gait—should trigger further investigation and potential intervention.

Effective Interventions

Once impairment is identified, addressing it with prompt and compassionate intervention is vital. The emphasis should be on providing support rather than punishment. The process begins with a private, non-confrontational discussion to express concerns and extend help. Following this, a formal evaluation by occupational health services helps paint a clearer picture of the physician’s condition. Crafting a customized support plan is critical, involving access to Employee Assistance Programs (EAP) and peer support groups that can provide the necessary resources and emotional support. Throughout this process, it is essential to ensure that all actions comply with medical board regulations and organizational policies to maintain legal and ethical standards.

Medical Evaluation and Leave

A formal medical evaluation becomes a cornerstone in understanding the extent of a physician’s impairment. Such an assessment guides decisions regarding the need for leave and the type of treatment required. Evaluations often encompass physical health assessments directed by occupational health professionals, prioritizing both physical and mental health. Where substance abuse is suspected, specialized assessments by addiction specialists are necessary. To safely resume work duties, a physician must obtain medical clearance from a licensed healthcare provider, certifying their fitness to return with any specified accommodations.

Return to Work Policy

To ensure safety and smooth reintegration into professional life, a comprehensive return-to-work policy is vital. The NAOHP’s Physician Return to Work Policy outlines essential procedures. Physicians are expected to notify their department head or HR about their intention to return at least 30 days in advance, wherever possible. Before returning to work, a medical clearance is mandatory, confirming the physician’s suitability to resume full duties. To support their transition, workplace adjustments such as modified tasks or phased schedules may be necessary. Regular monitoring and access to support services like EAP ensure ongoing recovery and prevent relapses.

Total Worker Health Initiatives

Total Worker Health (TWH) initiatives are proactive measures aimed at integrating workplace safety with health promotion. TWH focuses on creating safer and healthier work environments, which is particularly beneficial for those struggling with mental health and substance abuse. Initiatives may include mental health workshops, counseling, and stress management programs designed to reduce stigma and encourage openness about mental health issues. Substance abuse prevention programs provide vital information and resources for those needing help. Additionally, health promotion activities—promoting regular physical activity, healthy eating, and work-life balance—help cultivate a supportive environment. Comprehensive support systems, ensuring access to occupational health services, EAPs, and on-site counseling, are crucial for addressing issues before they escalate.

Resources

• Employee Assistance Programs (EAP): Confidential counseling and support services, often provided by organizations.
• Occupational Health Services: Health evaluations and support for work-related health issues.
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA): Resources and support for mental health and substance abuse.
• American Medical Association (AMA): Resources and guidelines for physician health and well-being.
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH): Information on Total Worker Health initiatives.
• The State of Mental Health in America

​

Conclusion

The recognition, intervention, and comprehensive support of impaired physicians are pivotal in ensuring a safer, more supportive healthcare environment. Leveraging Total Worker Health initiatives enables proactive management of mental health and substance abuse issues, ultimately fostering the overall well-being of healthcare professionals. Continued dedication to these principles ensures that physicians remain focused and capable of delivering the highest standard of care to their patients, promoting trust and confidence in the healthcare system.

References

1. Substance Abuse:
   • Skipper, G. E., & DuPont, R. L. (2011). “Physicians and alcohol use disorders”. Journal of Addiction Medicine.
   • Hughes, P. H., Brandenburg, N. A., et al. (1992). “Prevalence of substance use among US physicians”. JAMA. This often-cited study provides foundational information about substance use among physicians.
2. Mental Health and Burnout:
   • Mata, D. A., Ramos, M. A., & Bansal, N. (2015). “Prevalence of depression and depressive symptoms among resident physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. JAMA.
   • Shanafelt, T. D., Hasan, O., & Dyrbye, L. N. (2015). “Changes in burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance in physicians and the general US working population between 2011 and 2014”. Mayo Clinic Proceedings.
   • Shanafelt, T. D., Boone, S., Tan, L., et al. (2012). “Burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance among US physicians relative to the general US population”. Archives of Internal Medicine. This study compares burnout levels of physicians to the general population.
   • West, C. P., Dyrbye, L. N., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2018). “Physician burnout: contributors, consequences, and solutions”. Journal of Internal Medicine. This article explores the prevalence, impact, and strategies to address physician burnout.
   • Landman, Karen. (2023). “The mental health crisis among doctors is a problem for patients“
3. Suicidality:
   • Schernhammer, E. S., & Colditz, G. A. (2004). “Suicide rates among physicians: a quantitative and gender assessment (meta-analysis)”. American Journal of Psychiatry.
   • Center, C., Davis, M., & Detre, T. (2003). “Confronting depression and suicide in physicians: a consensus statement”. JAMA.
   • Gold, K. J., Sen, A., & Schwenk, T. L. (2013). “Details on suicide among US physicians: data from the National Violent Death Reporting System”. General Hospital Psychiatry. This publication provides detailed statistics and insights into the rates and impact of physician suicide.
   • Harvey SB, Epstein RM, Glozier N, Petrie K, Strudwick J, Gayed A, Dean K, Henderson M. Mental illness and suicide among physicians. Lancet. 2021 Sep 4;398(10303):920-930. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01596-8. PMID: 34481571; PMCID: PMC9618683.
4. Addiction in Emergency Medicine:
   • Baldisseri, M. R. (2007). “Impaired healthcare professional”. Critical Care Medicine. Discusses issues related to substance use impairments among healthcare professionals, with special attention to high-stress specialties like emergency medicine.
5. General Mental Health:
   • Wallace, J. E., Lemaire, J. B., & Ghali, W. A. (2009). “Physician wellness: a missing quality indicator”. The Lancet. This article addresses the need for focusing on physician wellness as a critical quality indicator within healthcare systems.
   • The State of Mental Health in America