Scenario: You’re treating a worker injured on the job. Clinically, you believe they need temporary work restrictions to heal safely (e.g. no heavy lifting for a week). However, the employer – a valued client – urges you to write “Full Duty” in the medical record, despite your recommended restrictions. Why? Because if no official restrictions are documented, the case might avoid being logged as an OSHA recordable injury. The employer even suggests giving the employee verbal restrictions off the record. Some occupational health providers feel pressured to comply in order to “preserve the account.” This puts you in an ethical bind: How do you handle such a request, stay compliant with regulations, and still address the employer’s concerns about OSHA recordables and lost time?
In this article, we’ll break down the OSHA recordkeeping rules at play, discuss the physician’s obligations, and offer guidance on balancing patient care with employer concerns.
OSHA Recordkeeping 101: When Do Restrictions Make an Injury “Recordable”?
Under OSHA’s recordkeeping regulations (29 CFR Part 1904), certain outcomes of a work injury trigger a requirement for the employer to record the case on their OSHA 300 log. These include any work-related injury or illness that results in death, days away from work, restricted work or job transfer, or medical treatment beyond first aid, among others. For our scenario, the key trigger is “restricted work.”
What counts as restricted work? OSHA defines it in two ways: either the employer keeps the worker from performing one or more routine job functions (or from working a full shift), or a physician or other licensed health care professional recommends that the worker not perform one or more routine functions or not work the full day. In plain language, if you as the treating physician say the employee cannot fully do their normal job due to the injury, that is considered a “restricted work” case in OSHA’s eyes. Even if the employer doesn’t actually offer light duty (or if the worker ends up doing their normal job despite your advice), your recommended restriction makes it recordable on the log as a restricted-work case. OSHA guidance is crystal clear on this point: any case with a medically recommended work restriction (beyond the day of injury) is recordable as an injury involving restricted work.
Example: You note in the chart, “No lifting >25 lbs for one week.” This is a recommended restriction. Even if the employer tries to ignore it or the employee feels they can work normally, OSHA says the case must be recorded because a licensed healthcare professional recommended limiting the worker’s routine duties. Similarly, if you recommend the employee take days off work, the employer must log those days even if the employee comes in to work against advice. The OSHA log entry is based on what was recommended, not just what actually happened, since the goal is to accurately capture the severity of the injury.
“But what if I don’t write the restriction down?” This is exactly the scenario some employers are driving at when they ask for “full duty” notes with only off-the-record instructions. OSHA has anticipated this kind of ambiguity. Their recordkeeping FAQ addresses vague restrictions like a doctor saying an employee can do “light duty” or should “take it easy for a week.” If the employer isn’t sure whether the worker can still do all their routine job functions, they are instructed to ask the doctor for clarification. OSHA’s rule of thumb: if the answer is No (the worker cannot do all their normal, routine tasks or full shift), then it is a restricted work case and must be recorded. If the answer is Yes (the worker can do everything normally expected), only then would it not count as restricted work. In other words, telling a worker “just take it easy” implies there is some limitation – and if that limitation impacts their regular duties, it’s OSHA-recordable even if not explicitly written.
Bottom line: From an OSHA compliance standpoint, physicians should never fudge the work status. If an injury genuinely warrants restrictions, you must acknowledge that. Writing “full duty” contrary to your medical judgment doesn’t erase the reality of an injured employee who shouldn’t be doing certain tasks. It does, however, create a false record. And OSHA considers under-recording injuries a serious issue – the agency’s 2016 rule explicitly aims to improve accuracy of injury data, because discouraging or hiding reportable cases leads to incomplete, misleading logs. In short, failing to record a work restriction (or day off) when one is medically indicated is non-compliance with OSHA regulations.
The Ethical and Legal Obligations of the Occ Med Provider
Beyond the OSHA rules, as a treating occupational health professional you have ethical duties to the patient (the injured worker) and legal responsibilities in documentation. Accuracy and honesty in the medical record are paramount. The ACOEM Code of Ethics emphasizes that occupational medicine physicians must “conduct professional activities with integrity, honesty, and transparency”. Falsifying or omitting critical medical information (like necessary work restrictions) at the behest of an employer violates this principle. Remember, the medical record is a legal document. If a worker’s condition later worsens or a dispute arises, and it comes to light that the physician knowingly downplayed the injury or work limitations to appease the employer, there could be significant liability and professional consequences.
Patient safety comes first. ACOEM’s Ethical Principle I states that our primary obligation is to the health and welfare of the worker. If returning to full duty could harm the employee or impede recovery, it’s your duty to say so – in writing. Providing only verbal restrictions creates risk: the worker may feel pressured to exceed those unofficial limits, or supervisors may not honor unwritten instructions. This can lead to reinjury or a more severe incident. It also potentially undermines the worker’s rights in a workers’ compensation claim (since work status affects eligibility for certain benefits). As the treating physician, you are the advocate for the injured worker’s well-being, even when that means delivering news the employer doesn’t want to hear.
Legal considerations: In workers’ compensation cases, your work status reports carry weight. Writing “full duty” when you actually advised modified duty can not only harm the patient, it could be construed as fraudulent or improper documentation. While each state’s laws differ, physicians have been reprimanded for falsifying medical records or misrepresenting a patient’s condition. Moreover, OSHA can penalize employers for not recording injuries properly. Knowingly helping an employer circumvent recordkeeping rules (e.g. by withholding recommended restrictions from documentation) could entangle you in an audit or investigation. It’s just not worth it – legally, ethically, or professionally.
Why Employers Care: OSHA Log Implications and Misconceptions
It’s important to understand why an employer might make this request. OSHA recordables, especially those involving days away or restricted work, can negatively impact an employer’s injury statistics (the OSHA 300 log feeds into metrics like the Total Recordable Incident Rate and DART rate – Days Away/Restricted/Transferred). A high number of recordables can raise insurance premiums, trigger OSHA inspections, or affect bidding on projects. Employers also often treat “lost time” cases (days away) as a bigger red flag than “restricted duty” cases. In some safety incentive programs, they get bragging rights for zero lost-time injuries, so they might be very averse to any doctor’s note that results in an OSHA log entry beyond first aid.
However, these concerns do not justify bending the rules. Savvy safety professionals know that an OSHA recordable is not an admission of fault or a violation – it’s simply recordkeeping. In fact, a company’s attempt to suppress legitimate recordables is far more troubling to OSHA. The agency wants accurate data and has prohibited policies that deter reporting injuries. If an employer is fixated on avoiding every recordable at all costs, they may need re-education on the purpose of the OSHA log.
Addressing the OSHA Log Fear: You can acknowledge the employer’s desire to minimize recordables, and there are legal, ethical ways to do so – but only up to a point. For example:
- Use of First Aid when appropriate: Ensure that you are not “over-treating” injuries. OSHA doesn’t count first aid measures as recordable, so if a minor injury can be managed with first-aid-level care, stick to that. Don’t prescribe prescription medications or order unnecessary procedures solely out of caution if they aren’t medically needed, since that could convert a non-recordable case into a recordable one. (Example: For a superficial laceration, using wound closure strips (first aid) instead of sutures (medical treatment) keeps it non-recordable while still providing proper care.) Similarly, recommending over-the-counter pain relievers instead of prescription meds when appropriate will avoid triggering a recordable on the “medical treatment” criterion.
- One Day Grace: OSHA does not require recording restrictions or missed work on the day of injury. If an employee is hurt, you can legally advise them to take the rest of the day shift off or do very light duties for the remainder of that day, and it won’t hit the log. This “day of injury” grace period is often enough to get the worker through acute pain, with a plan to re-evaluate the next day. If by the next shift they’re well enough for full duty, the case might avoid becoming recordable. (Of course, never hold a worker back beyond what’s safe just to dodge the log – but using the remainder of the day for rest is an acceptable strategy.)
- Know the Job’s Routine Functions: OSHA’s restricted-work definition hinges on whether the worker is prevented from doing routine job tasks (those performed at least once per week). If your restriction doesn’t actually affect a weekly routine function, the employer might not have to count it as a “restriction” case. For instance, if you say “no climbing ladders for 3 days” and the employee’s regular job rarely involves ladder-climbing (say it’s an occasional monthly task), OSHA would not consider that a routine function – thus it wouldn’t be a recordable restricted case. Understanding the job’s essential functions can help tailor restrictions that protect the worker without unnecessarily sidelining tasks that are truly core to the job. Collaboration with the employer on this can sometimes find a middle ground: perhaps the worker can avoid non-essential strenuous tasks (which don’t count as routine) while still performing the bulk of their job.
That said, if a key duty must be restricted for safety, there’s no “loophole” – it’s recordable. And that’s okay. Remind the employer that one recorded restricted-duty case is far better than a serious injury or OSHA violation. Employers should focus on preventing injuries rather than hiding them. OSHA itself has noted that energy spent “trying to avoid OSHA recordables” is better spent improving safety systems. A recorded case signals an injury happened – it’s data to learn from, not necessarily a black mark if handled correctly.
Handling the Pressure: Practical Steps for Physicians and Clinics
So, how should you respond when an employer client nudges you to omit or alter work restrictions for an injured worker? Here are some practical steps and talking points:
1. Stay Firm on Medical Necessity: First and foremost, do not compromise on what is medically best for the patient. Politely but clearly explain: “For the employee’s safety and recovery, I need to document these work restrictions.” Emphasize that this is a standard of care issue and that you would be remiss not to put it in the record. Sometimes framing it as “I’m protecting the employee and the company from further harm” can help – if the worker gets worse because they weren’t properly restricted, the employer could face a much more serious problem (extended lost time, higher comp costs, even a potential lawsuit).
2. Cite the Rules and Regulations: It often helps to educate the employer about OSHA requirements. You might say, for example: “OSHA regulations require that any work-related injury with medically recommended restrictions be recorded on the OSHA log. If I leave the note saying ‘full duty’ when in fact I told the worker not to do X, Y, Z tasks, we are essentially under-recording the case – which is not compliant.” Point out OSHA’s guidance that even “light duty” or informal instructions count as restrictions if they limit routine job functions. When employers realize you know the OSHA recordkeeping rules well, they may back off pressure, understanding that you’re following federal law, not just being uncooperative.
3. Offer to Discuss Accommodation: Shift the conversation to solutions rather than suppression. For instance: “Let’s talk about how we can accommodate these restrictions to keep the employee productive.” Employers fear recordables partly because of the lost productivity or downtime associated with injuries. If you can help them find suitable modified work for the employee, you address their productivity concern and it becomes a restricted case (which, while recordable, at least is not a lost-time case). Remind them: a restricted-duty case (where the employee works albeit not fully) is often preferable to a days-away case in terms of impact on the business. Encourage the employer to view temporary accommodations as a positive – it gets the worker better while still contributing at work, and it demonstrates the company’s commitment to employee well-being.
4. Use Objective Language in Documentation: When you do write restrictions, make them as clear and specific as possible, tied to the injury. This leaves less room for an employer to claim they’re “confusing” or “unnecessary.” For example, instead of a vague “light duty,” specify the exact limitations (e.g. “no lifting >25 lbs, no repetitive overhead reaching, may work up to 6 hours/day”). This precision aligns with OSHA’s advice to clarify vague restrictions. It also protects you – a precise restriction is harder to ignore or misinterpret. If an employer suggests, “Can’t you just say ‘avoid strain’ instead of a weight limit?”, hold your ground. Precision is part of good care and ensures everyone is on the same page about what the worker can and cannot do.
5. Escalate if Needed: If an employer representative overtly pressures you to falsify a medical record, consider involving your clinic’s administration or medical director. As an administrator or provider, you should have a policy for handling such situations. This might include offering to have a three-way conversation with the employer, the employee, and you to explain why the restrictions are needed. In extreme cases, where an employer persistently expects unethical behavior, you may need to reconsider the relationship. No client’s contract is worth risking your medical license or reputation. Fortunately, most employers, once the regulations and liability are explained, will relent and work with you on a compliant solution.
6. Document Conversations: It can be helpful (for your records) to document any instances of such pressure. For example, if an employer says “please just give verbal restrictions,” make a note in the chart or an internal log that the employer requested no written restrictions and note your response. This creates a paper trail that you advised appropriately. Hopefully it never comes to an OSHA audit or legal dispute, but if it does, you have evidence that you acted in good faith and the employer was aware of the medical advice.
Win-Win: Focusing on Recovery and Compliance
At the end of the day, your role is to facilitate a safe recovery and return-to-work for the injured employee, while helping the employer navigate the situation within the legal framework. Emphasize the common goal: “We all want [Employee] back to 100% as soon as possible.” By framing restrictions as a tool to achieve that goal (and potentially prevent a minor injury from becoming a major one), you can often bring the employer to see the value rather than just the OSHA recordable downside.
Many employers also fear that an OSHA recordable will ruin their safety stats. You can put it in perspective: one or two recordables in a year for a mid-size company is normal – and aiming for zero by suppressing cases is a dangerous game. What truly reflects well on a company is how they handle an injury, not pretending it never happened. Prompt, proper medical care, appropriate modified duty, and no lost time is actually a success story in workplace health and safety. That’s exactly what OSHA’s recordability criteria encourage – for employers to keep workers at work (if medically safe) and to take injuries seriously. In fact, OSHA allows an employer who gets two differing medical opinions to choose the one they feel is most authoritative. This means if an initial clinic sent the worker home for a week (lost time) but a second opinion (say, by your occ med clinic) clears the worker to perform some work with restrictions, the employer can log it according to the second opinion. Using that rule appropriately is fine – it’s intended so employers can seek an occupational medicine specialist’s input. What’s not okay is shopping for a favorable opinion when the injury truly merits limitations. As an ethical provider, you won’t be part of that kind of charade.
Conclusion: Compliance and Integrity First
When faced with an employer asking you to downplay or omit work restrictions to dodge OSHA recordables, remember that compliance and integrity come first. You can be empathetic to the employer’s concerns and proactive in finding solutions, but don’t cross the line into inaccurate reporting. Your clinical judgment and the worker’s health must remain the top priority.
By clearly explaining OSHA’s requirements and offering to collaborate on accommodating the worker, you often can satisfy the employer’s underlying concerns (minimizing production impact and OSHA log impact) without violating rules or ethics. Most reasonable employers, once educated, understand that a short-term restricted duty assignment is a far better outcome than risking the worker’s health – or risking OSHA penalties for hiding an injury.
In sum, handle the situation by being an advisor: educate the client, protect the worker, document honestly, and stay within the regulations. This approach not only keeps you compliant, it actually builds trust in the long run. Employers will see that you operate with professionalism and authority, which ultimately strengthens your credibility as an occupational health partner.
Next Steps – Improving Your Occupational Health Practice: If you found this guidance helpful, consider taking the next step in strengthening your occ med program. We offer additional resources to help providers and clinic administrators excel in managing work injuries:
📬 Get a Free 4-Week Sample of Our Weekly Practice Tips
For a limited time, subscribers can preview our Weekly Occupational Health Practice Tips — practical, real-world guidance on injury care, employer communication, OSHA compliance, and more.
✅ Includes 4 sample tips delivered over the next month
✅ Designed for busy occupational health providers and clinic leaders
✅ No fluff – just smart, usable advice you can apply right away
🛡️ NAOHP Members receive the full Weekly Tips Series ongoing as part of their membership benefits. Learn more or join here.
- 🔍 Further Reading & Weekly Tips: Sign up for our free Weekly Occupational Health Tips series, where we tackle real-world scenarios like this and keep you updated on best practices and regulatory changes.
- 🎓 Provider Training: Enroll in our Occupational Medicine Provider Course, a comprehensive program covering OSHA compliance, workers’ comp case management, and effective communication with employers.
For a deeper dive into this specific issue, including a sample “OSHA Log Integrity & Return-to-Work Documentation” and step-by-step policy and procedure for handling return-to-work documentation requests, check out our Members-Only Practice Brief on this topic. (This in-depth brief – with template policies – is available exclusively to our subscribed paid members.)
Ensure you’re equipped with the knowledge and tools to handle these delicate situations. With the right approach, you can meet employers’ needs without ever sacrificing compliance or ethics – a win-win for your practice, your clients, and your patients.
